you are here: Home /
 

SC: Who is the expert to say what’s ‘unnatural sex’

By Krishnadas Rajagopal
Updated Thursday, 16 February 2012 11:02:53 - IST (UTC +5:30)

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday started hearing the debate on legality of decriminalising same sex behaviour in private among consenting adults by asking contestants whether the “order of nature” changes with time.
The court was hearing a bunch of petitions challenging a Delhi High Court judgment on July 2, 2009, which ruled that sexual intercourse among adults of the same sex is not a criminal offence under Section 377 of the IPC.
Section 377, framed in 1860, is titled “unnatural offences” and criminalises “carnal intercourse” which are against the “order of nature”. It does not specifically define any of the three terms.
The provision reads: “Whoever voluntarily has carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment of either description for term which may extend to 10 years, and shall also be liable to fine.”
“So who is the expert to say what is ‘unnatural sex’? The meaning of the word has never been constant,” a Bench of Justices G S Singhvi and S J Mukhopadhyaya said.
“We have travelled a distance of 60 years. Now it is test tube babies, surrogate mothers. They are called discoveries. Is it in the order of nature? Is there carnal intercourse?” the Bench asked
To this, advocate Amarendra Saran, who represents Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights, said the “order of nature does not change with time”. The Union Home Ministry, government bodies and private groups are among those fighting the July 2009 judgment in the SC.
The opposite side, including Naz Foundation, which had taken the cause to the High Court, have advocates Fali Nariman, Shyam Divan and Anand Grover, among others, to represent it.
The High Court had declared that the interpretation of Section 377 IPC to criminalise homosexual behaviour done in private among consenting adults violates fundamental rights like the right to protection of life and personal liberty, to equality and the right to prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth.
The penal provision, however, continues to apply in the case of sex involving minors and coercive sex.
The questions came from the Bench as soon as Saran began submitting that the High Court had not considered that Constitution imposes reasonable restrictions on citizens in the exercise of their rights.
He argued that rights cannot be exercised in violation of the existing law (Section 377).
But the Bench intervened to ask Saran to first explain the legal meaning of words like “natural”, “unnatural” and “carnal intercourse” used in Section 377.
The court said they would handle the case on a step-by-step manner: First look into the meaning of the terms, then look into the High Court judgment and then see whether Section 377 IPC is only a “reasonable restriction” to the citizen’s fundamental rights under Articles 14, 15 and 21 of Constitution. (IE)

Tags: Krishnadas Rajagopal Homosexuality, carnal sex, IPC, Section 377, fundamental rights,

  • MUMBAI: The last time Muslims and Dalits created a joint political platform in Maharashtra was in the 1980s. Led by former smuggler and don Haji Mastan, the Dalit Muslim Suraksha Mahasangh (DMSM)...

    2012-05-07 17:11:22 |
    0 comments
  • MUMBAI: Chemical analysis of a powder-like substance collected from a Byculla apartment where two suspected Pakistani 13/7 bombers stayed has proved that it is the deadly explosive RDX. The...

    2012-05-03 17:34:23 |
    0 comments
  • Srinagar : For Abdul Rashid Khan, it has been a long wait for justice. Twelve years after his father Juma Khan was allegedly picked from his house, killed in a fake encounter and dubbed a foreign...

    2012-05-03 17:30:23 |
    0 comments
  • New Delhi : The Supreme Court gave the Army full “discretion” to choose between a court martial and a criminal trial for seven officers accused of killing five persons in an encounter in...

    2012-05-03 17:27:07 |
    0 comments
  • New Delhi. Syed Ghulam Akber, member Markazi Majlis-e-Shoora (Central Advisory Council) and former Secretary Jamaat-e-Islami Hind breathed his last at Care Hospital in Hyderabad at about 1 p.m....

    2012-04-30 20:38:08 |
    0 comments
  • Government responsible for Communal Violence in Hyderabad city RSS outfits Communalizing the situation and polarizing population by developing Communal Sentiments. Introduce and pass Communal...

    2012-04-25 11:01:25 |
    0 comments
  • MUMBAI: The last time Muslims and Dalits created a joint political platform in Maharashtra was in the 1980s. Led by former smuggler and don Haji Mastan, the Dalit Muslim Suraksha Mahasangh (DMSM)...

    2012-05-07 17:11:22 |
    0 comments
  • NEW DELHI: The Bhartiya Janta Party's (BJP) decision to not support the Congress party candidates for the upcoming presidential elections seems to have led to fissures within the National Democratic...

    2012-05-01 17:28:10 |
    0 comments
  • The annual budget of a country reflects the Governments priorities. It is, in fact, the preface of the financial year's book. However, there is no noticeable mention of Muslims and other minorities...

    2012-04-22 12:15:55 |
    0 comments
  • Faizabad: The Uttar Pradesh government has sought legal opinion to withdraw terror cases against falsely implicated accused of November 23, 2007 serial blast case in Faizabad and Lucknow court...

    2012-04-15 19:47:03 |
    0 comments
  • The many shifts among voters that went into the SP’s tremendous victory This election has been a role reversal for Samajwadi Party and the Bahujan Samaj Party in Uttar Pradesh. From 206 seats in...

    2012-03-23 20:15:44 |
    0 comments
  • New Delhi: Government today heaved a sigh of relief as amendments moved by opposition to the President's Address on NCTC were defeated in the Rajya Sabha, where UPA is in minority, with the help of...

    2012-03-20 17:53:56 |
    0 comments